您的位置:三立在线 > SAT频道页 > ACT > 大神带你精准踩中ACT考点
咨询热线:400-808-3771

大神带你精准踩中ACT考点

2018-03-07 19:26 三立在线 admin

分享到: 0

摘要:改版后的ACT写作考试除了给你一个写作总分,还有四个大能力单项分。每个阅卷老师眼睛都很厉害,他们能够在短时间内快速找出考生写的这篇作文里的各大采分点,为了通关ACT写作考试,供大家考场上作战使用。 首先,开头首先简单明了的写清话题,以及这个话题所对应你的立场。要注意的是你的立场要体现你对这个controversial issue 的价值

 

 

  改版后的ACT写作考试除了给你一个写作总分,还有四个大能力单项分。每个阅卷老师眼睛都很厉害,他们能够在短时间内快速找出考生写的这篇作文里的各大“采分点”,为了通关ACT写作考试,供大家考场上作战使用。

  首先,开头首先简单明了的写清话题,以及这个话题所对应你的立场。要注意的是你的立场要体现你对这个controversial issue 的价值判断,保持中立态度都ok,但你不要摆一个fact。你必须让阅卷人立刻知道你论证主体部分要支持或反对的内容。同时,开头段不必使用各种高大上长难句,你可能最终没能让阅卷老师明白你的意思,反而让他觉得你逻辑混乱。

  其次,由于新版ACT写作考试中题目中给的perspective1,2,3你必须全部进行回应,需要在草稿纸上写essay map进行brainstorming时要把这三个已给出的论点都考虑进去。对于和你立场一样的perspective,你只需把它拉到你方阵营,然后论证你的观点,立场不一样的perspective,一般有两种原因。第一,它可能和你讨论这个问题的角度不同,但是内容合理,你归纳一下你们都想说哪一大类的内容,然后你的论证角度是什么;第二,你可能根本不同意它表述的内容,那么你指出你哪不待见它即可,然后接着论证你的观点。建议大家在段首先写topic sentence,如果哪个perspective和你本段观点相似,提一两句。然后接着论证你的本段立场。或者先指出和你立场不一样的perspective,你不同意它哪了,然后本段你的立场又是什么,接着还是继续论证你的观点。最后在每段结尾加一个conclusion 进行总结或transition进行承上启下,重申一下你本段的立场,给阅卷老师留下一个你论证的严密的影响。毕竟是persuasive essay,写的越formal越好。平时的写作课建议同学们用2-3个段落作为论证的主体段落。

  最后文章的最后一段,由于时间有限你只需给文章加个很简单的结尾,不求长篇大论只需再次重申一下这个问题你的立场,就是paraphrase 一下thesis statemen! 希望大家都能取得一个好成绩!

  附:官网给出的新版ACT写作样题和官网给出的满分例文

  Intelligent Machines

  Many of the goods and services we depend on daily are now supplied by intelligent, automated machines rather than human beings. Robots build cars and other goods on assembly lines, where once there were human workers. Many of our phone conversations are now conducted not with people but with sophisticated technologies. We can now buy goods at a variety of stores without the help of a human cashier. Automation is generally seen as a sign of progress, but what is lost when we replace humans with machines? Given the accelerating variety and prevalence of intelligent machines, it is worth examining the implications and meaning of their presence in our lives.

  Read and carefully consider these perspectives. Each suggests a particular way of thinking about the increasing presence of intelligent machines.

  Perspective One Perspective Two Perspective Three

  What we lose with the replacement of people by machines is some part of our own humanity. Even our mundane daily encounters no longer require from us basic courtesy, respect, and tolerance for other people. Machines are good at low-skill, repetitive jobs, and at high-speed, extremely precise jobs. In both cases they work better than humans. This efficiency leads to a more prosperous and progressive world for everyone. Intelligent machines challenge our long-standing ideas about what humans are or can be. This is good because it pushes both humans and machines toward new, unimagined possibilities.

 

  Essay Task

  Write a unified, coherent essay in which you evaluate multiple perspectives on the increasing presence of intelligent machines. In your essay, be sure to:

  analyze and evaluate the perspectives given

  state and develop your own perspective on the issue

  explain the relationship between your perspective and those given

  Your perspective may be in full agreement with any of the others, in partial agreement, or wholly different. Whatever the case, support your ideas with logical reasoning and detailed, persuasive examples.

  官网满分例文:

  As technology improves, and more and more tasks are completed by machines instead of humans, the question is no longer about what we can do with machines, but rather what we should. Although the usage of machines increases efficiency and our standard of living, it detracts from the value of human life.

  As machines increasingly perform all our basic tasks, society is able to produce more. The additional production adds material value to our society and frees people up from these low-skill tasks. This is in agreement with Perspective Two which claims that this industrialization leads to more prosperity.// For example, in the 18th century, short-staple cotton that was grown in the Southern United States required an immense amount of labor in order to separate the seeds from the fiber to process the cotton to make it marketable. However, in the mid-19th century, Eli Whitney, an American entrepreneur, invented the cotton gin, which allowed for automation of cotton processing. This machine replaced the need of a large work force for the process and greatly improved production. As a result of the cotton gin, short-staple cotton production skyrocketed, increasing by more than 10 times in the South while bringing prosperity to the region and setting in motion a new industrial era in America. This is in agreement with Perspective Three, which says that mechanization allows for “unimagined possibilities”. Although there are clearly many advantages to industrialization, there are also some heavy drawbacks.

  The replacement of humans by machines leads to the loss of value to human life, an effect that outweighs the material gains of automation. The search to find human tasks that can be performed by machines inevitably leads to comparisons between the human and the machine.// If a company executive wants to see if a inventory management team can be replaced by a robotic system, he will compare the two and determine which can do a better job. When this occurs, the people on the team are evaluated not for their worth as human beings, but for their effectiveness at performing a specific function—in essence, as we would evaluate a machine. In a larger sense, when we begin to think about humans in this way, the worth of a person’s life becomes dependent on only what they can do and no longer has any intrinsic value. As Perspective One states, we begin to lose our humanity. This new mindset and way of evaluating people, though seemingly harmless in the workplace, is devastating when it begins to pervade a society. If a person is judged only on his or her capability, there is no reason for a person to remain after they have served their function. This would warrant genocide against the elderly and the disabled because their burden on society would not be made up for by any production. Although the machines may seem to only fulfill the low skill jobs at the moment, there is no barrier to prevent the machines from replacing more. As the machines increase in intelligence, they will replace any tasks done by humans and render us unnecessary and worthless.

  Due to the risks of dehumanization, the material benefits of machines are not enough to justify its increasing presence.

 

三立在线培训ACT课程优势:
ACT模考冲刺一对一、强化小班课程:以2008年-2017年全部真题为基础而制定的全国最优质的课程计划。
上课材料:北美与亚洲真题;
教师上课方式:方法论(1/4课程时间)+ 专题训练(1/4课程时间)+ 套题训练(1/4课程时间)+ 查缺补漏(1/4课程时间)
督导材料:(词汇为例)根据学生目前的词汇情况选择以下材料:基础3600次、阅读高频词汇、科学高频词汇、套题词汇、ACT分级单词;???
督导方式:讲词、背词、抽词
赠送:100小时录播课程、督导服务、24小时答疑服务、在线ACT题库VIP账户。
赠送:全部真题逐题精讲

 

相关字搜索:ACT考点   
ACT在线咨询

Copyright ©2004-2018 www.xiaoma.com All Rights Resserved 三立在线版权所有

咨询电话:400-808-3771 地址:上海市静安区愚园路172号B座12楼

关于我们 网站地图

沪ICP备16042710号-7

京公网安备 11010802021370号













无法在这个位置找到: kefu_code.htm