7月2日

错误的，意识中不记得的，没有听清楚的，去掉的

We have been looking at the factors leading out(up) to the American Revolution. Today I want to look more deeply into what the colonists in the 1700 were thinking and feeling. What motivated them to change the political order varontly(violently猛烈地，激烈地), was it money, social injustise(injustice不公平), religious in colorise(intolerance不能忍耐). Without question, American colonists saw the conflict in turn(terms of) the political issues. They are concerned was(with)
" m4 z0 O  C: a+ i2 s* Q4 Hnot so much the economic problems, as it was how the colonists wanted and indeed
! U8 ]! N. x/ t  S& Dso big(thought they deserved) to live. In other words, the American Revolution was about liberaty(liberty 自由) a(the) protection in the personal liberty. You see the colonists share to believe that was quite radical at that(the) time. They believed that person had rights; these rights were not based on the genaral city(generosity 宽容) of the king and they were not based on the language of the law. But(The) colonists believed in a(The) higher law, one of the grad(that granted承认)- \1 }/ `# }$ S+ L/ e0 `3 P
people rights, rights that they were born with and which couldn't be taken away by any human being. Unlike(unless) of course someone commit to(the) crime, and then they have to go through the proper legal steps. Now what words is(were these) rights, I'll co(quote引用) directly from declaration of independence which states them clearly: Nihon (we hold) these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are in down(endowed资助) by the creator with certain in(inalienable不可分割的)
( Q* Y& x' k- a0 |rights that manys(among these) are life, repretty (liberty) and persive(pursuit追赶) a(of) happiness. The colonists had a new vision of what the(make) political theority(authority权力) legitimate(合法的) and what they(make) personally liberty secure. Their vision were benefit(was this), legitimate government require the consent同意 of those been the government(who be in governed). So to understand how events lead to the revolution, we need to understand pacifically(specifically) how political power had been exercised by the British and(in the) colonists. Any ideas

主体大概听出来了，错了一个，最后一句走神了……

坚持吧！！！

7月3日

错误的，意识中不记得的，没有听清楚的，去掉的

But too often, it seems to meet we private determine the(apply the term) invention only the(to) big and important items like the car or the telephone. After all, we can now hardly imagine surviving without them. We don't stop to think that there are literally hundreds of inventions that make our life a little lazier(easier), a little more convenient. Let's take something is commomest, (as common as) the paper bag on my desk here, yes, that’s right, I've got my lunch in it. Well, I never open my lunch bag without thinking of Chill Stevil(Charles Stilwell) who was in 1883 to invented the first machine to produce bags like this. You see, before Stilwell, bags were paced(pasted) together by hand and they didn't have flat bottoms so they couldn't stand on their own, and they(you) couldn't fall(fold折叠) them very well either. Stilwell changed of(all) that was(with) what is really a mabled(marvelous不可思议的) piece of engineering. Think about it, look at how efficiently this bag is designed. I can open it with a flick轻打 of my reft(wrest 力量), but I can also fold the bag (it back) flat as apiece of paper and I can store a hundred of them under my desk. What's more, it is strong, see, I can even put this heavy dictionary in it, and it won't break. But it's cheap to produce; really it's a master piece(masterpiece 杰作) of practical engineering. Growsery(Grocery 杂货店) stores by(buy) over a billion of them every year. Well, nobody remember Stilwell nowadays, but his litery(little) invention has certainly proved useful. If any of you could produce anything half(help) as useful, you have really done something

" q  N4 n% }$ J% i6 Y

! ^- D) a: D' Y4 P

又错了一道~~~没听出来……

跟读的效果非常明显，我目前听这个已经基本能听懂了，但是某些细节可能听不出来……fighting~~~

with 和 was~~~ 总听不出来……

落落好久考哟 这莫拼命 9 b; C9 F5 U8 w- ^
坚持哟～～

10月12日~~~
, ~7 V- p% j' Y- f; a达达什么时候？？

7月4日

错误的，意识中不记得的，没有听清楚的，去掉的

W：I was talking before the break about funding an(in) art in the United States, about where the money comes from, I think some of you probably have some questions, yes Tom?

M: You said that during the depression, the governments provide a belief(relief work) to a lot of the artists, just what sort of works did they do.

W: It depended on the kind of artists you talking about, a lot of painters did work for government buildings, mirrors(murals 壁画) and city halls or other public buildings for example. Scoters(Sculptors 雕刻家) did work in putting(to put in) public park, that's all (that sort) of the things.

M: Didn't people get upset about government spending so much money on art?

W: There were some critic I'm(criticisms) sure. Many people considered the program wasteful. they thought that creating a public art was not real work, like paving a road or putting up a building. But the government was concerned with getting as many people employed as possible

M: Could I ask about one more thing? I expected that art from 1930’s to be in stressed(abstract), but what you showed in the slides was pretty realistic.

W: You maybe a little mistaken(mixed up) there. Abstract Expressionism that the name(main) of American abstract school, it usually associated with 1950.

M：Was there a document(dominant) artist style that these depression era历史时期 artists used?

W: Let's look at a few more slides. Maybe that will show you. Also, there was an exhibition in Washington a few years ago about this art, so I put a catalog from the show I(on) reserve in the library, if any of you want to see more examples about this work, go over and take a look.

题做的不好，错了2个，还有一个是蒙对的。

关键词depression 和 press没听出来，前一分钟内容基本听清楚了，后面的半分钟有关学生提问他没听清楚的作品风格那块还有老师的解释没听出来。

关键词关键词关键词！！！！我的训练重点！！！！

嘻嘻，就说吗，好久不见，又出现了。：）

呵呵~~~谢谢大家~~9 K1 H3 n( q+ g* R& m
我昨天出去了~~所以晚上才写的，昨天没发出来……

7月5日

错误的，意识中不记得的，没有听清楚的，去掉的

W: I'm reading this book about jazz so I quote some(for that course on) popular culture I'm taking. Listen to these quotes by Louis Amostrong, when someone asked him what jazz music was, he said: if you get an(getta) ask, you'd(will) never know. What do you think about that?

M: Oh, I don't think jazz was that serious(mysterious). I mean it’s just some(another) kind of music. Thinks(Seems)
" B. o" n& @1 y# w- {to me like a person used to(not) be able to study it to break down into pieces. I took the classic musical appreciation course lest semester and the professor told(taught) us the kinds of things to listen for, to understand the music. I doubt if(don’t see why) I couldn't do the same things for jazz of(as) I learnt to do for classic music.

W: Well, from what this book said, a lot of people try to apply rules of the western musical theory for(to) jazz music, like the rules he probably learnt, but(that) you need to appreciate that jazz is according to its own style(set) of rules. Unlising(Analyzing) jazz but(by the) same rules as classic music would be like using the woof(rule) for unlike(analyzing) a short story to unlike(analyzing) a poem.

M: Oh, come on, it's obvious that poem has a different structure from the short story, but just how in(is) jazz so different?

W: Ok, well, one of the examples is the beat
) S+ `' s; _  b5 n# T" Y. In European music, the ground beat is built into the melody to mean(the main) sound line, you can tap your foot to it, but in jazz, the ground beat is literally(deliberately故意的) avoided in the melody. The beat is used to be as f(has to be established) by the whole separated section of instruments like bass or drum.

M: All right, I'll give you that, rhythm(Really it) is a pretty important difference, but is that all?

W: No, there are other differences. Like, traditionally, classic music is based on certain types of music scales, major and minor. Virtually(Fortunately我觉得这个我是对的~~) all of this music is built around differences and changes the new(these) style of skills(types of scales). But a lot of jazz is based on the blues and blues skill(scales) isn't major or minor.

错了一个，有关poem 和 short story 的关系没听出来~~

晚上11点做的~~困了~~所以听写的错误比较多~~~明天早上起来再听一次~~看能不能减少点错误~~虽然有点滞后了，而且不客观了……嘿嘿

7月6日

错误的，意识中不记得的，没有听清楚的，去掉的

I'd like to move on now to still life painting in the United States. Now the earliest American still lives were modeled on 17 century Dutch still life paintings, the images of which often simplize(symbolize) the home and growing prosberity(prosperity 兴旺，繁荣) of Dutch merchants. So in these early American paintings, you might see, for example, a simple table top display of food or other in merdoritic(inanimate 无生命的objects). Now the still lives of the 19 century, reveal a great deal about the time in which they are(the artists) lived. For examples, in the first half of the 19 century, many American were prospers(prosperous 成功的), 1 \6 d1 u9 x& [! z- Q) L; w6 B0 P
and shopping and accumulating things were major pastimes消遣. So in these paintings, the consumer ore(oriented) in American society is they can choose(conveyed ture) display of the goods that stand of (suggested the) lunchery(luxury) and social status. Well, f(this)' O/ A3 _$ G. x6 d" `/ V( N( T

3 _. c9 u, r+ M$ A. b0 }also suggested with representation of plentiful foods, pluch of (fragile脆弱的)flowers and other beautiful objects of nature world. Then, after the Civil War, in approximately the middle(mid) of 19 century, the mood of the country changed, that does(likewise同样的) the mood of the paintings changed. For example, the artists might apply the paint rusling (roughly) to depote(depict描绘，描画) the group of bettered(battered身体受伤的)
% z9 ?5 ], C; j4 ?0 q- Z; kold things that simplize(symbolize) difficult times and the disappearance of good days. So let's look at some slides(Flight’s) of paintings from this period, and see you if can determine time of(when) the paintings were created

题目错了一道，原因是不认识prosperity~~

听写的时候阻力很大，很多句子觉得听得困难，有很多陌生的单词~~

对答案的时候果然如此~~~

还有很多是认识但是不熟的单词，所以反应不过来，比如：conveyed true~~

继续努力~~~

早上跟读昨天的对话也很费劲~~~男的读的好快啊~~~~~~@>_<@!!