在你决定是否要花上宝贵的几个小时的时间来读这篇文章的时候，你完全可以参考以下5个问题来进行自我对照，然后自己决定：　　1、写作文写来写去总是觉得无话可说，感觉就是在凑字数，GRE作文到底写多少字才算行？
　　2、写来写去总是那几种套路，看得自己也厌倦了，而且词汇贫乏，用来用去只是写浅显初级词，GRE词汇记不起，也不会活用。
　　3、作文时常常发现论据论证不足，而且常常发现脱离了现成提纲就写不下去，有时还有跑题倾向。
　　4、不会写复杂的长句，不知道牛人的复杂精巧的句子结构如何捏成的。
　　5、时间紧张，规定考试时间下各方面都较平时练习时相差甚远，如何解决？
　　本文旨在以上5个主要方面阐述GRE作文的入门修炼和进阶提高思路，不是系统介绍GRE作文方方面面的攻略，也不是如何教你写出“满分”的作文，若你有耐性看完的话，相信你自己就能领悟达到高分作文的途径。

一、GRE作文整体认识（基础）

　　GRE作文全称叫Analytical Writing Assessment，我们通常称之为“逻辑写作”，那么首先我们从这里端正一下我们对其的认识，重心把在“逻辑”（Analytical）之上，即这两篇作文的性质是以“逻辑思想”为中心的，换句话说，也就是“思想第一性”！尽管GRE作文对语言方面的要求远远高于其他同类考试，如TOEFL，但是不可否认的是，语言并不能主要影响你的得分，思想才是关键。我见过很多考生，语言能力通过反复练习，借鉴和背诵，达到了相当高的水平，但是写出来的东西是“成人思想婴儿化”的东西，肤浅无深度，最后连qualify的级别都达不到，就是一开始重心把偏的缘故。好，意识到了这点，我们开始具体分析如何操练GRE 作文。在以下的分析中，我将重点剖析大家普遍较难掌握的ISSUE类作文大讲特讲，而对ARGUMENT只是在几个关键的须纠正常识错误的地方带一下即可。Are you ready？ Let's go！！！

　　二、GRE作文的要求（根本）

　　无论是ISSUE还是ARGUMENT在评分标准上都有共同之处，考察之后，不难发现，都要求：第一，观点有深度，例证有说服力；第二，组织有条理；第三，表达清晰准确；第四，语言流利，句式复杂，词汇丰富；第五，语言地道标准；第六，少有轻微错误。可以说，这六条标准就是6个评分段，大家平时在练习时，可以参照这六条给自己大分，同时我们可以看到，关于语言要求的内容都在“末三条”，可见其地位较“思想逻辑及条理性”可退居其次，从而印证了上述结论。第一条说的是“思想性”，第二条说的是“结构性”，第三条说的是“表达性”，从这里入手，我们就分别采取“各个击破”的方法解剖GRE作文的本质。

　　三、GRE作文的思想性（第一性）

　　原则一：准确审题，全面回应

　　很多考生往往对关乎自己作文命运最关键的部分却不屑一顾，结果往往“下笔数百字，离题十万里”。时间对于考生来说的的确确是个不可不考虑的重要环节，但是审题是一种好的“习惯”，是对应试者最基本素质的考验，马虎不得。后面我们会提到如何作文，就是如何“借题发挥”，如何“点到为止”，不经过这道工序，是不可能“功成身退”的。之所以如此关注强调这点，一方面是因为一旦“跑题”（主要是在ISSUE中），将接受ETS最severe的惩罚，被叛 “0”分，同时也是因为这种现象很普遍，比如下面一篇来自网上的ISSUE作文就出现了这种“症状”。

　　注：病历文章来自猴哥满分网，范文主要就所讨论之处作出示范，并非一定是什么“高分作文”，主要是silentwings的文章，所选话题均来自近半年来笔者等人在华东区考场实战真题。

29.“Public figures such as actors， politicians， and athletes should expect people to be interested in their private lives. When they seek a public role， they should expect that they will lose at least some of their privacy.”

　　（病历文）

　　Everyone has the right to keep his/her privacy， including the public figures. People have the nature to learn others' privacy， especially those of the celebrities for various reasons， such as reverance and curiousness， but it doesn't follow that they are entitled to pry others' private life， and it is really unfair to say that any public figure choose to expose his/her privacy by himself/herself as long as he/she seek a public role.

　　In the current days， it is a widely spread atmosphere that people take a strong interest in talking about the private life of celebrities， they even rival each other in the fact that who knows more about a common interested celebrity. To cater such a taste， more and more mass media try their best to collect each aspect of a public figure's private life with an interest even exceeding that of making known their work. When we read a entertainment paper or magazine， we are certain to find that most of the content are the private life of singers and stars， such as someone got a divorce with his/her ex-girlfried/ex-boyfriend and is now keeping contract with someone else， etc.

　　All that exists is not valid， we couldn't say that it is in reason to spy into others' privacy just because most people prefer to do so， and we should not just accept a unfair fact without exert any effort to change the circumstance. To put your own feet in the shoes of the public figures， do you feel comfortable to be watched everywhere you go， and find a lot of affair news about you in the media especially when most of the news are made out by the pressmen？ If your answer to this question is no， you should agree that we are obliged to do something to change the current situation about the private lift of public figures. Special laws should be enacted to discipline the prying into privacy of the mass media， sound should be heared arguing again people's interest in celebrities' private life.

　　Only when the public figures are librated from the harassment of worrying about their privacy's protection， we can expect a better service from them， and in that case， more capable people will be attract to pursue a public role. Suppose that if a singer is followed everywhere he/she goes， how can he/she lead a normal life as common people， how can he/she gets a relaxation？ He/she must be cautious when he/she every words， he/she can't expect a casual and relaxing atmosphere as every common people can enjoy. It is difficult for him/her to concentrate all their energy in working， as a consequence， we would lose some more brilliant performance we can expect otherwise.

　　In summary， we should call on the public to cease to spy into the celebrities' privacy and pay more attention to their public life， only in that way can the public figure enjoy their life better and can we expect a better service from them. （496 words）

　　评析：这篇文章的主要失误来自作者未能仔细审题便下笔一蹴而就，题目所讨论的对象明明是Public Figures，从头到尾讨论的主体居然成了Public，说他们如何如何关注明星隐私，说他们如何如何设身处地地为明星们着想，最后总结说是公众应还明星们于自由之躯，把一上来合理的“否定回应”抛之脑后，从而导致文章“答非所问”。考虑到文章一上来合理回应，以及不错的语言表达，仅有几处不起眼的拼写错误，应判为“2分”（有严重错误类文章）。

　　在出示范文之前，我们就此题谈谈“审题”和“回应”这两个基本问题。

（1）审题的原则：“字斟句酌，明确对象”，我们读题就是要弄懂题目要让我们干什么，然后才能相应知道该怎么干。GRE作文都是议论文，写议论文就好比 “打仗”，知己知彼方能百战不殆。这个题目不难读懂，先翻译如下：“公众人物，例如演员、政治家和运动员等应该预料到人们对他们私生活的关注。当他们决定成为公众角色时，他们应该料到自己的一些隐私将被供之于众。”显然，经过审题，我们发现题目探讨的是公众人物“是否应该”预料到自己隐私的暴光。话题将讨论设定在这个范围内，同时给出了一个参考的见解，“他们当然应该知道”，并给出理由，“他们自己决定成为公众人物”。整个话题是个“should”类型的 ISSUE（详细分类见后文），前后句呈“因果关系”（执果索因）。这才是完整的审题，才是完整正确把握文章的第一步。
　　（2）回应的原则：“攻其一点，兼顾其余”。也就是说，回应要找准重点，其余部分只须略微带过，作到“回应重点突出而全面”，这点在ISSUE和“ARGUMENT”中都是普遍适用的大前提原则，也是“高分作文”的要领之一。这里我们已经知道作这篇文章要从“公众人物”自身出发，以他们的角度来看待自己隐私是否该暴光的问题，这样我们就找到中心回应点是“should expect”，对象是“public figures”，而例证可以充分利用话题的友好提示：列举的三种人，选择熟悉易于表达的来充实论证，免了自己的劳神工夫，这种资源一定要善加利用，一方面可充实论据，另一方面，作到了兼顾其他，全面回应的原则。下面的范文采取AGREE的态度，采用should类文章的清晰“套路”，作到了合理回应，请读者就这方面仔细分析。

（范文）
　　A million times I have heard the accident regarding a certain famous star shouted to separate fervid journalists and interviews from various media outside his or her door， which finally results a farce of quarrel and fight. Sometimes I really hate those drab reporters， who surprisingly have the endless power and fresh tricks to snatch almost each shadow of celebrities together with the innate ability to embellish them so “fascinating”。 At the same time those public figures shriek for their overexposure of privacy I am always pity for their embarrassment， for their career they really have no better choice but to tolerate， for their legitimate rights they had better struggle against the privacy revelation. But most of them， in the end， choose the former despite without any mustered negotiation.
　　It is obvious to take into mind that being a public cynosure the first thing one has to be even eager to sacrifice is the privacy， in that the quality of public is just the opposite of privacy， in the rim of relationship， either one can only be maintained. The fundamental aim for a celebrity is to stand strong in the sight of public and win over the precious approbation from his or her fans. So packing oneself in his single world can help nothing to add his reputation， what he strives to do is the reverse-anatomize oneself in front of the public stares and acclaim for his names being praised or criticized in the sun-then can he make himself known out of the nonplus of being forgotten and lose his prestige in public. As a result， the condition of privacy being traced and published is no more a paramount incidence but under the prediction of them； after all， no reports， no celebrities.
　　Hence， if a public figure intends to preserve his title， no grouch he ought to hang at lips， on the contrary， he might be thankful to these indefatigable journalists and reporters for their free propaganda of his talk and behavior pattern. Take the teenage star-backstreet boys for instance； with the sales of their albums skyrocket， their reputation is more and more stentorian， following the trend of their ordinary life becoming an incandescent focus attracting public eyes. Then as we all know， backstreet clothes have been prevalent， backstreet sneakers also is in heat sale， and personal parlance begins to appear some exotic features commonly shared by teenagers just because backstreet boys ever talked like that. A five-boy chorus can influence so many groups of people by what they said and what they did， the feeling of satisfaction and proud could be no better to describe their elation of success than for the byproducts of the privacy publicized， this time they probably even couldn't help to rush up to the media reporters and proffer their kisses.
　　Oh， well， to the scandals mostly reported in any entertainment channel， these figures ultimately reaches a top limitation of inured tolerance， especially those survive by their shingles of excellent prestige， such as those politicians. In the period of election of presidents or senators， the most headache those participants suffer is the side report， which has the overwhelming clout to remove his precious stake to his adversary's side. Then the only thing they must remember is the discretion of their words and behaviors either in public case or merely in private room. There is no absolute stalwart wall that can resist the strong blast， and the unique paper that can wrap the burning flame. According to this principle， the expectation for their privacy no longer staying for himself is no doubt fathomable to them， astonishment is just an effete struggle.
　　To sum up， being an illustrious man have to pay his privacy for the undertaking brilliance， and he should understand without the public desire to delve their everyday life instead of merely relying on their limited published works， they convincingly cannot earn such a lot from their maniac supporters， who also need them to care for and give enough regards as feedback. Once this complex relationship being disentangled， I think， the public figures and populace will make a balance on the scale of privacy revelation. （690 words）

在切实掌握好这些技巧之后，后续的问题也会接踵而来，很多考生在认识到问题的严重性之后，不知道如何从开始回应起就把握好文章的走向而不跑题，作好条理性的框架是必须的，但是最简便的方法就是（千万注意啊！！！）——将话题的内容编成问句，自己的每段回应编成回答，如果作到有问必答，那么你就没有跑题，否则就要重新构思回到正轨上来。这个方法在备考初期研究题库预先构思时尤为重要，他能检验你提纲的合理性，否则一旦到了考场，你来不及重新构思而盲目照搬，后果不堪设想。希望这里的这点提醒能够引起各位考生足够的重视，不要白白无谓牺牲。
　　而这个问题对于ARGUMENT来说，情况要好得多，一方面由于ARGUMENT回应方式比较固定且其较ISSUE来说约定俗成的高度模式化，另一方面是由于ARGUMENT的易于操作性和熟悉性，利用的资源都来自题干本身，因而考生在这篇作文上很少看走眼。但是也有些题目，由于脱胎于ETS惯常的逻辑单题模式，本身语言饶口，且容易将论据与结论混淆，从而导致一定程度的攻击失误，虽然不至于像ISSUE那样导致全盘失误，但是毕竟在最好拿分的项目上失分无疑是给原本脆弱的分数雪上加霜。下面我们看一道在去年年末左右华东考场遇到的一道少见的ARGUMENT难题，难就难在对于论据和结论的辩识和推理上，还有就是逻辑谬误不是像其他题目那样明显地向你挥手 ——“向我开炮！！！”
　　142.The article entitled 'Eating Iron' in last month's issue of Eating for Health reported that a recent study found a correlation between high levels of iron in the diet and an increased risk of heart disease. Further， it is well established that there is a link between large amounts of red meat in the diet and heart disease， and red meat is high in iron. On the basis of the study and the well-established link between red meat and heart disease， we can conclude that the correlation between high iron levels and heart disease， then， is most probably a function of the correlation between red meat and heart disease.
　　析题：仔细读过，发现这道题有点绕，很多考生曾经有过这样的困惑：“我没有理解最后一句话的意思is most probably a function of the correlation between red meat and heart disease.是说high iron level于heart disease之间的关系是red meat与heart disease之间有关的结果那作者到底是认为high iron level和heart disease之间有没有关系阿？”再读之下，我们会发现作者其实做了一个顺接推论：red meat引起心脏病——> red meat里面还有大量的铁——> 高铁引起心脏病，就是这么一个简单的推论过程，关键认清谁推出谁，就要在审题时注意到关键的这么看似不经意却被友好的ETS“重复两次”的短语“well established”，也就是说“大量红肉与心脏病之间一定有联系”是不容质疑的论据，即本题论据是不容批驳的，关键问题在于由论据推导出结论的时候犯了“Implicit causal claims”和“gratuitous assumptions”（详细逻辑谬误分类见后文“七宗罪”），因而我们就可以以次展开攻击。很多来自网上的文章和提纲在本题上颠倒了推导对象，把“高铁引起心脏病”作为论据来推出“red meat引起心脏病”，结果导致文章失误。下面读者可通过以下范文检验一下该论证过程和思路：

（范文）
　　The correlation of the high irons level and heart disease the arguer trying to prove is not as perfect as he assumes. Although at first glance， his cause-and-effect analysis seems quite cogent， yet it can't stand much reexamination.
　　I agree to the well-established theory concerning the necessary relation between the large amount of red meat in people's diet and heart disease， but no other possibilities can be ruled out except for one of the ingredients-iron. It is obvious that the arguer constructs his building of conclusion on the basis of the conviction of the deleterious function stems from the iron. While not only a single iron does red meat contain， as we all know， many other components also have the influential role once being indigested into human body. For instance， some type of particular protein it might include， instead of the iron， is the substantial root of heart attack. So the arguer's peroration has no convincing power for this gratuitous assumption.
　　Moreover， even though his deduction does really derive from some passage of authoritative researches he has no opportunity to list below， the assertion about the high levels of iron related to the possibility of heart disease cannot be got through by merely so qualified the evidence exhibited here. According to the arguer's elicitation， we believe the red meat does contain large amount of iron， however， we might ask ourselves such questions enlightened by our common sense， “Does the amount of iron involved in red meat reach the dangerous level enough to lead to heart disease？” The answer we can't obtain through this short argument， thus directly make us doubt the whole fruits the arguer attained.
　　As it stands， the study reported on the published media Eating for Health is inevitable filled with some lethal logic fallacies， which finally weakens the cogency of the whole claims. To such a paramount and sensitive issue relative to people's health and life， scrutiny is not allowed to be neglected； and it is just for this point， I'm afraid， no people could ultimately abjure for eating red meat as a result of reading this ridiculous article. （352 words）
　　——silentwings
　　原则二：“大胆创新，敢于说'不'”。
　　这个原则是就思想内容本身而提出的，主要就ISSUE而言。之所以如此，是因为现在的题库中有太多显而易见的明显带有“常识偏见性”的话题，比如下面我们要举例说明的这一题：
　　33.“Creating an appealing image has become more important in contemporary society than is the reality or truth behind that image.”
　　我想大部分考生在现场一定会不约而同地对这道题说“DISAGREE”，因为传统的教育和是非观很容易让我们接受这样的一个观点——“人不可貌像，海水不可斗量”。这样，ETS胆敢认为“表面的虚浮外表比实质的东西重要”，充分暴露了它资本主义没落腐朽的罪恶本质和虚伪贪婪的丑恶嘴脸，于是打笔一挥，打他个鼻青脸肿再说。
　　不可否认，这个话题写“否定”符合正常价值观和正常思维，比较容易找到地方下手，但是平常我们在训练准备作文时，应该在遇到这类“难于从反面论证”的题目尽量摈弃这种正常思维，而锻炼自己的“创新思维”，即敢于对自己的“陈规思维”说“不”！大家可以发现，ETS找来的每道话题都是经过严格的筛选和试验的，以保证其客观性和公正性，从而无论你对该话题持什么态度，都不会影响你在现实中的表现，从而每个观点阐述就是一种思维逻辑的“游戏”，ETS不是要看你的思想观点到底出不出格，而是看你将任何一个你所持有的观点论证的天衣无缝。
　　因为在ISSUE中，你完全可以将一个漏洞百出的话题包装成真理，同样也可将真理辩驳成天大的谬误，这没有关系，对于一个特别注重“新思维”开发的美国人来说，创新思维无疑是他们最钟爱的东西，这也就是高分作文的一个捷径——求新求异！我始终相信，只要肯往这方面想，思维的马达很容易就开动起来，通过不断练习，你真的会发现你的一手“铜齿铁牙”已经足以让你在GRE作文的考场上称雄称霸，“满分”是意料中的事。下面我提供两篇范文，第一篇是正常思维论辩，第二篇则是从AGREE的角度来论证，读者可以从中参详一二。

（范文一，反对）
　　As a prevalent proverb saying “ the mentality forpulchritude is applicable to any one”， from the time of primitive age，people have started to pick up some natural raw materials， most ofwhich have chromatic colors or exotic configurations， to embellishtheir simple furniture， hunting tools， also the clothes people dressthemselves， so on and so forth. The tradition has been handed downuntil today， but great difference has been appeared to the major use ofdecoration for appealing image， instead of the mainstream for beauty，it now turns to the recommendation to any other else under thecircumstance of covering the real face behind the image， which isactually important than the former creativity.
　　It is notunfathomable that the ballooning civilization incites the residents ofour community to behavior more and more graceful and decorous， which ifreflects onto the side of ordinary life the appearance of a persontogether with his ornamentation is the predominant embodiment. To showrespect to your friends the moment to display your polished civility，you should dress neatly， and prepare an elaborated wrapped gift torealize the goal mentioned above， thus taking the use of the creationof an appealing image. And the importance in personal relationship andcommunication is too ponderous to be neglected.
　　However， when weput so much attention on the process of constructing an attractiveimage， do we ever think about what takes major effect is just theobject itself rather than the elaborated appearance？ Take themerchandise for instance， the more dazzling the image is， the more theprice it is， the difference between a wrapped one and an original oneis paid on these seemly futile except for some silly placationindividually. Everything should have a deserved value， which isregarded as the fundamental principle of the market operation， tells usthat the price should as near as possible to adhere to the real valueof the commodity consumers really intend to have instead of the illicitextortion by adopting some alluring tricks such as these meretriciousskins. Hence， from the perspective of vast consumers， who care most isthe actual quality of the things they want to purchase， the creation ofappealing image aggravates the benefits belong to customers， meanwhilegives a disguising shield to help some profiteers to snatch extra bonusoriginally not merited.
　　Besides for these side effects it canproduce， when applied to the mask of human nature， what is moreimportant directly determines the destiny of humanistic mentality. Acharismatic man only can rely on his wisdom and disposition to appealothers， in that any material things all cannot stand the erosion oftime elapsing， while the intrinsic spirit cannot extinguish with theascendance of ages， only altered with human's own intellectual quality.From the skit of “Hypocritical gentleman” we clearly learns that evenif how perfect a man dissembles himself and how much approbation he atfirst win over from the public， ultimately falsehood will be penetratedand he still can go back nowhere but the initiative himself. Thereby，the lasting attractiveness stems from the unique face veiled under thecover of the superficial mask.
　　Overall， despite the beautifulappearance always can gamble the first-eyed excellent impression，either for things or for humans， no better ideas to be taken than toconsider more about the decorum and quality of itself， only throughthis can we make out the real value needed for enamor and evaluation，which teaches us the virtue of sticking to truth， the most importantthings for ever. （577 words）

范文一，反对）
　　As a prevalent proverb saying “ the mentality for pulchritude is applicable to any one”， from the time of primitive age， people have started to pick up some natural raw materials， most of which have chromatic colors or exotic configurations， to embellish their simple furniture， hunting tools， also the clothes people dress themselves， so on and so forth. The tradition has been handed down until today， but great difference has been appeared to the major use of decoration for appealing image， instead of the mainstream for beauty， it now turns to the recommendation to any other else under the circumstance of covering the real face behind the image， which is actually important than the former creativity.
　　It is not unfathomable that the ballooning civilization incites the residents of our community to behavior more and more graceful and decorous， which if reflects onto the side of ordinary life the appearance of a person together with his ornamentation is the predominant embodiment. To show respect to your friends the moment to display your polished civility， you should dress neatly， and prepare an elaborated wrapped gift to realize the goal mentioned above， thus taking the use of the creation of an appealing image. And the importance in personal relationship and communication is too ponderous to be neglected.
　　However， when we put so much attention on the process of constructing an attractive image， do we ever think about what takes major effect is just the object itself rather than the elaborated appearance？ Take the merchandise for instance， the more dazzling the image is， the more the price it is， the difference between a wrapped one and an original one is paid on these seemly futile except for some silly placation individually. Everything should have a deserved value， which is regarded as the fundamental principle of the market operation， tells us that the price should as near as possible to adhere to the real value of the commodity consumers really intend to have instead of the illicit extortion by adopting some alluring tricks such as these meretricious skins. Hence， from the perspective of vast consumers， who care most is the actual quality of the things they want to purchase， the creation of appealing image aggravates the benefits belong to customers， meanwhile gives a disguising shield to help some profiteers to snatch extra bonus originally not merited.
　　Besides for these side effects it can produce， when applied to the mask of human nature， what is more important directly determines the destiny of humanistic mentality. A charismatic man only can rely on his wisdom and disposition to appeal others， in that any material things all cannot stand the erosion of time elapsing， while the intrinsic spirit cannot extinguish with the ascendance of ages， only altered with human's own intellectual quality. From the skit of “Hypocritical gentleman” we clearly learns that even if how perfect a man dissembles himself and how much approbation he at first win over from the public， ultimately falsehood will be penetrated and he still can go back nowhere but the initiative himself. Thereby， the lasting attractiveness stems from the unique face veiled under the cover of the superficial mask.
　　Overall， despite the beautiful appearance always can gamble the first-eyed excellent impression， either for things or for humans， no better ideas to be taken than to consider more about the decorum and quality of itself， only through this can we make out the real value needed for enamor and evaluation， which teaches us the virtue of sticking to truth， the most important things for ever. （577 words）

范文二，赞成
　　I support enthusiastically the idea that in contemporary society “creating an appealing image” is much more important than the reality or truth behind it. What I stick to this preference for is based on large amount of personal experiences and reported statistics.
　　From the childhood we are encouraged to study industriously as to find a well-paid occupation， and to attain this hankering， endless sweats and bloods have been exhausted from our revere parents. When the day finally comes for graduation， we really have been ready to welcome a new life. But， do you ever think of this question， “Are you actually shape yourself as what you intend to be during the long-range learning life？” Obviously， until your first earned single penny arriving at your hands nothing can be illustrated. Similarly， an elaborate product equipped with most advanced technology after tens of years' research， could be approbated by public， no words might be more convincing if it is enabled to be successfully pushed to the top sales in the commercial market.
　　Then， the problem is be disinterred from the surface of reality， what is functioning as the major role in the “sale”， either the commodity is “yourself” or some “product”。 A recent survey reported on an official journal reveals that this year almost 50% of the graduates cannot find favorable job， among which more than half of them even have relatively wonderful resume and education background. How can they fail to sell themselves out at an ideal price？ In the process of survey， the surveyor also surprisingly found that many famous companies would rather like to pick up the interviewers whose image is fashionable and characteristic than those who are deprived of this disposition， in spite of their diplomas are much brilliant than the former ones. The survey does evoke my deepest thoughts in my mind.
　　 Why those companies who are famous for their practical strategies have established such standards to choose their recruits？ Well， finally， according to my field research， the answer is too obvious to believe. In the employing market， what you can do is to display yourself like a piece of artwork and then wait for your connoisseur. Then how can you expect your ideal employer will exclaim to you， “I'll take this！， absolutely！” ？ Instead of examining your practical capability to fit in the particular work of his apartment， which in fact is not qualified to the real conditions at that moment， he merely justifies your ability through the image appeared in front of him， as the principles tightly held for him that an appealing image is a crucial reflection of the actual substance. Till now， you can easily distinguish the importance of the image， and the reality or truth， before being uncovered under the sun， leave it where it is； it's his destiny. As to the commodity， more facile understanding can be digested in that a taking skin outside the material body is a good propaganda and appealing incentive to lure people's desire for acquisition.
　　Hence， it is for quite a simple reason that such appealing image has been becoming more and more momentous： without it， no matter how perfect the reality or truth behind it， no opportunity can they be rendered as their real value escaping the tragedy criticized as zero， just as the end of the survey report saying， many interviewers sadly curses themselves with tears to prefer to never have it. （568 words）