前天的
$ P0 G  x4 g& J7 _, D( aThis is Scietific Science of journal Science.I'm Steve Morskiy.Got a minute. （While）I'm talking you're not possibly（just passively被动地 ） listening .Your brain is also busy at wrok,guessing what （the）next word that I would (will)say. Before I actually speak it,you've thought I ( was )gonna say"say"didn't you? Our brain (actually)consider many possible words and their meanings before ford(we’ve heard ) the final sound of the word inquest(in quest) of being understood. Language comes uo with flying unit(at you at) up(to) 5 sllybomes(syllables音节) per second( So it was thought that) the listener(s) keep paces by antispating(anticipating a ) small subsate(subset子集) of all words that listener(s) are familier with.Think(of ) our(how a) google search antispates(anticipates期望) words based on the(first) few words(letters) you type in.But now scientists of ( have used)use functional mynathnic grader imgane (magnetic resonance磁共振 imaging ) to actually to watch brain consider different words they report the proceding(in the Proceedings ) of the national icamay(Academy学院，研究院) of Science. They narrow the choices by considering the words (that)begin with the same sound.(so)If I say I taste the sweetest can...your brain might already promit( be priming预先预备好) itself in here(to hear) Candy,maybe cantelop(cantaloupe哈密瓜，香瓜) but not candle.Who needs the game show network you always play match in your head.

This is Scientific America（'s) 60-second Science.I'm Cythina Graber.This will take a minute.
( J6 c6 N4 P' s2 XRemember when Barbe Wine said (Barbie whined that )"Math is hard ",maybe you've got annoying (ed at )hearing a poular female doll say that to( little) girls, (or) maybe you are also negating supection( had a nagging 挑剔的，唠叨的suspicion怀疑) that effects(, in fact, ) boy(s) are better at math. (Well, )The lastest research add an end the resulting ( is in, and the answer is a resounding 十足的，彻底的）"No".Boys are not more math sally(boys are not more math savvy).The finding appears( in the) July 25th issue of journal Science.Janet High(Janet Hyde at) the University of WisConcinet Medecine(Wisconsin-Madison威斯康辛州 麦迪逊) lead (led)the study .The Group duck (dug挖)through a pine(piles一大堆) of information from 7 million students tested in (through)"(The)no child left behind"programe across ten states.(Researchers had)Detail(ed) in personal fill on(info on the) test takers.Research check(ed) out math( tests ) in differet grades. They take(took) the average,no difference.The credits(Some critics批评家 have)  said  that the difference only shows up when (among the highest levels )higher level(s) of math skills. So the team check(ed) out the most gifted children.Again,no difference.From any angle girl(s) measure(d) up  (to) boys.Still there are ('s a)lack of women in (the) higher (highest)level of professional math ,engineer(ing) and physics,someof them have said that（’s） because of they are in （innate天生的，先天的）difference （in math ）ability but new research shows that explanation just doesn't add up.

Reading  Listening  Speaking  Writing  Total  4 m* ^" ]/ x1 ~* K0 o
   24           27             19             18        88  7 ]5 y  F3 R) c0 {& w1 n9 \7 |

4 O5 F: F. q) M4 {) E; Kreading Listening 是属于输入型的 靠平时水平更多些，6 M0 m) ?" G& a* X; I3 ?- D0 {
Speaking，writing, 属于输出型的  靠平时多练

总的成绩比我料想的要好很多 象听力 做到加试部已经完全没耐心听的是讲什么了  凭着JJ的记忆回答得问题可见加试应该不怎么算分吧。。

写作第两篇就写了200字。时间就到了  没conclusion.。。就是平时不练的报应。。谁叫你裸考阿！！拿刀插自己。。！！！！
; ]- C3 T( s- ~/ i以后要严格执行听写完跟读政策 平时多积累模板佳句 相信一定能有所提高~

之所以现在开始听写 又把这张这么无耻的帖子顶起来是时时刻刻提醒自己要克服惰性！！！！！！！！！！！

坚持是王道~

$ @/ p( [7 u+ K& ~3 F

! s2 \, Q6 n+ c, k9 |  t3 E[ 本帖最后由 chimo 于 2008-11-13 12:26 编辑 ]

前段时间由于个人原因 没有及时加分 请谅解  
" k" D$ G1 e- i/ A' R5 S$ _继续坚持听写！加油

这篇听着也很抽。。。7 d% O3 B9 H2 j7 \- A& B4 x5 i* h! T5 A
跟读要跟上。。。
, U: L& w9 |) ~; WThis is Scientific American's 60 Seconds Science.I'm Cythia(Cynthia) Graber.This will(This'll) just take a minute. It took thirty(thirteen) years and countless hours of reseach to unreveal(unravel拆开) the human genal(genome基因组). Now nerv scientists(neuroscientists) want to their feels(field’s)version.Small group of reseachers is advicing(advancing) a( the)mergeing felt(field of ) what they conact domercs(call “connectomics.”).As the drnomics(genomics ) move(d) from individual genes to(the ) entire genal(genome).So conact domeics( connectomics) wants to take us from individual nerves and brain to conaction (neurons神经元 in our brain to the connections)and wiring entire (nervous) system of network. That invole( involves) the nerve self(cells) the access streach (axons that stretch out )like wires The synipisis( synapses) transimited (that transmit) information it's adopting(daunting使人畏惧的) task- you have ( about a）hundred billion more （neurons）on（in) your brain.condomics(Connectomics） wouldn't be possible without computer processing image（and imaging.）.This last reseach to look at main access as a exmple （This allows researchers to look at a maze of axons轴突 in a sample ）and determine just which access （axon）can conact （connected ）to which nerve on（neuron）.It's （ as）complicated （ as）it sounds.Jeffly mis（Jeff Lichtman is a ） Harford Scientists to allow his four friends to affur（whose lab is at the forefront of this effort）.He say（s）detailing the conaction as signal（connections in a single ） human brain （would）require dating（data） storage requving （equivalent 相等的to）the google entire collection.But efforts（‘s） are under way.The say conadomercis can （Lichtman says Connectomics could ）teach us how bring （ the brain ）the process（es） of information and how we develop and learn.（Which, he says, is what makes us human.）